About the Editorial Team Behind This Review

What This Site Covers and What It Leaves Out

This document describes the editorial team that produces this website. It sets out how we work, what we will and will not do, how we test and score the broker reviewed here, where our facts come from, and how a reader can dispute what we publish.

It does not offer financial services and does not describe any such service. This site is not the broker, has no ownership or commercial link to the broker, and holds no client funds. Nothing here is an account, a deposit route, or investment advice. We do not present ourselves as regulated, licensed, or endorsed by any authority or third party, and no such status should be read into anything on these pages.

Explain Why We Publish This Review

The site exists because readers in India looking at an offshore broker often find only promotional material written by the broker itself or by parties paid to promote it. We wanted a plain account of what the firm offers, what the terms actually say, and where the risks sit, written for the person deciding whether to open an account rather than for the firm being described.

Our audience is the individual reader doing homework before committing money. We assume no prior knowledge of trading terms and no familiarity with how such firms are structured. We write for people who want to compare claims against documents and who are capable of forming their own view once the material is laid out clearly.

The team is small and independent. We take no payment from the broker for coverage, and the review is not commissioned, sponsored, or approved by the firm before publication.

Test the Broker and Assign Scores

We open accounts where the firm permits it and work through the deposit, trading, and withdrawal steps with our own funds, recording what we encounter at each stage. We compare the published fee schedule and contract terms against what the platform actually does, and we note where the two diverge.

Scoring follows a fixed set of criteria applied in the same way on each pass: the clarity of costs, the handling of withdrawals, the quality and responsiveness of support, the transparency of the legal entity behind the account, and the usability of the trading interface. Each criterion carries weight fixed in advance, and the total is calculated from those parts rather than set by impression.

We publish the reasoning beside the score so a reader can see which elements pulled it up or down. A score is a summary of our findings on the day of testing, not a prediction of how the firm will behave later.

Source the Facts and Check Them

Our facts come from the firm's own published documents, its platform and client area, correspondence with its support staff, and our direct experience of using the service. Where a claim about regulation or corporate structure matters, we look for the underlying register entry rather than relying on the firm's summary of it.

Every figure and statement is traced back to a source before it is published. A second member of the team reads each draft against those sources. Where we cannot verify something, we say so in the text rather than filling the gap.

We revisit the review on a regular cycle and after any material change we notice, such as altered fees, new account terms, or a shift in the entity holding client funds. Pages carry the date of the last check so a reader can judge how current the material is.

Invite Readers to Challenge What We Publish

If something here is wrong, out of date, or unfairly stated, we want to hear it. Use the contact form on this site and identify the passage in question, tell us what you believe is incorrect, and, where you can, point to the document or experience that supports your view.

We read every message. Where a correction is warranted, we amend the text and note the change. Where we disagree, we will explain our reasoning. We do not remove accurate findings because the firm or a reader would prefer them gone, and we do not alter scores in exchange for anything.

Keep reading

FBS Review for Indian Traders

FBS review for India: Belize-licensed offshore broker, up to 1:3000 leverage, USD/EUR accounts

MetaTrader 5 at FBS: A Technical Review for Indian Traders

FBS offers MT5 with ECN spreads from 0.0 pips, leverage up to 1:3000, and USD/EUR accounts

FBS Web Platform: Built for Speed, Benchmarked for India

FBS Web Platform for Indian traders: MT4/MT5, spreads from 0.7 pip, leverage up to 1:3000

FBS Copy Trading: What to Check First

FBS copy trading for Indian traders: how it works, costs, what to check first, and why…